Exakta Varex IIa

Exakta Varex IIa

“Woow!” This was the first thing came into my mind when I first saw an Exakta in a cabinet in a very small and messy shop of an old camera-repairman a couple of years ago. The second thing? Well, I seriously considered to lick it quickly while the owner looked away. It never happened due to the glass door of the cabinet and I can still feel the sensation of the missed opportunity -What a pity-.

Apart from the joke, I had been seriously touched by the appearance of this family of cameras, especially the older ones. It is an entirely mechanical, full glass, bare metal, chrome and leather piece of jewelry. I am almost certain that this camera triggered the entire steam-punk culture. There is no doubt that this is one of the most beautiful classic cameras of all times.

“True” Exaktas were manufactured by Ihagee in Dresden during almost 4 decades which resulted in an amazingly complete and comprehensive camera system. While I always keen to give a bit of historical overview of a camera system, I had to realize that others have done this on a level I simply cannot match. If you were interested in the different variants and history, please visit this link.  I limit myself to the most interesting facts I found out during my research and consider this post as a kind of tribute to Exakta and the company made it Ihagee.

It is interesting to know that the Exakta camera system was very stable during its evolution, almost all parts were interchangeable among models which are remarkable. There was a huge sort of accessories available for these cameras and they were heavily used for technical and scientific photography. I think this system was one of the most versatile at the time. For example, you can see below a commercial from a 1952 German magazine Die Fotografie where the camera is attached to a microscope.

Commercials from the magazine Die Fotografie 1952
Old poster in a camera shop (Budapest, Hungary)

The Exakta Varex was introduced in 1950 and the big innovation was the possibility to use the camera with the standard waist level finder or with a pentaprism. This interchangeable viewfinder system even further increased the versatility of the camera.   In addition, there were a big number of available finders of both types (4 basic pentaprism types) and all of them allowed to use a huge variety of focusing screens on top of it. They claimed in their commercials, that they merged the good old experience with modern ideas. You can check out the complete list of finders and screens on this page.

One of the interesting characteristics of this camera is the left-handed shutter release which (I believe) is inherited from the times when the camera used only waist level finder. It is very awkward at first and even at the second time to handle the camera because of this using the prism for those who got socialized on right-handed cameras. I guess it was no problem initially with the waist level finder and they kept this property. In fact, it is possible to get used to it, but it requires quite a commitment.

Commercials

I have managed to dig out a couple of high-quality commercials and posters released by Ihagee, this cool half cut camera poster can be seen in a camera shop in Hungary (Soós Fotó).  I have found and included in this post many more nice illustrations from books and magazines. It shows that the Exakta was really among the most prestigious SLRs at the time. It was literally the ultimate way to go for every possible purpose from photojournalism to science and technical applications where larger formats could not be convenient to use.

Commercials from the magazine Die Fotografie 1952

My Exakta

My Exakta is a subtype of the very long lasting and successful Varex IIa. This version was released in 1960 and the distinguishing feature is the logo which is not pressed into the metal anymore and the shape of the prism is slightly different than earlier models.

Varex IIa datasheet

  • Produced 1957-1963 this version was introduced1960
  • Film type 135 (35mm)
  • Lens mount Exakta mount (inner and outer bayonet)
  • Shutter cloth curtain (traveling horizontally)
  • Shutter speeds 12s – 1/1000, B
  • Sync speed 1/50
  • Viewfinder interchangeable waist level or prism
  • Exposure meter none
  • Self-timer
  • PC sync connections
  • Internal film cutting blade

This particular camera was sold in Antwerp, Belgium in 1961 and according to the catalog I have, the list price was 13.185 francs with the prism and Tessar standard lens. The second lens (Trioplan 100mm) had the price of 4.205 francs. I am trying to find out what could that mean at that time, but one thing is sure in Hungary this combo would have cost a complete year salary of a regular person in the 60s. In comparison for a Russian Zenit SLR, some had to work like hell for 2-3 months while consuming solar energy only for survival in Hungary those times.

The camera actually belongs to my Friend David who was kind enough to give it to me for use as he did with the Yashica TL-SUPER camera I reviewed. He received it from the original owner from Belgium, so I can actually track back the history of this camera until the beginning. Thank you again, David!

The camera came in the every-ready case, with 2 wonderful lenses. a high-quality B+W filer, a nice rare Carl Zeiss Jena polar filter, a Sunpak flash unit and all sort of documentation including warranty, and catalogs.

Exakta Varex IIa, Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar, Meyer Optic Trioplan, B+W filter, hard-case, catalogs,  warranty
Exacta Varex IIa in hard-case
Exacta Varex IIa in hard-case

Condition and repairs

Lens

The overall condition of the camera is very good, although the Tessar lens was really stiff, it was very hard to focus on.  In the opinion of my repair-man, it could have been stored in a cold place for a while. I have got the lens cleaned and lubricated and now it is as good as new. Again, the arts of lubrication was successfully applied, plus apertures and glass elements got some attention and cleaning. Important to note that the focusing ring is covered with some kind of plastic which became rigid over the years, and it is advised to take care of it as it is very fragile and can be broken for any little hit. If it breaks it needs to be replaced by leather with a similar texture which is a hideous task to do.

Shutter

The shutter was advanced when I first got it in hand, so the springs were tensed probably for many years ago and as it turned out the high shutter speeds are not really usable now. 1/500 and 1/1000 while they sound good the movement of the curtains are not even. As a result, some parts of the frame came out less exposed than others. It could be fixed by the master of the lubricants, but it would definitely cost a load of money. I decided to wait and until it gets fixed I started not to use these speeds. It seems everything works fine up to 1/250s and I have managed to carry out my second roll without any problem.

Mirror

The silvering of the mirror is damaged badly around the edges and it has a negative effect on the clearness of the viewfinder. There is no way to fix the mirror because the silver just melted down. The only solution is the complete replacement, but as I use this camera casually only I decided to keep it as it is for a while.

The way it looks

Exakta Varex IIa
Exakta Varex IIa top
Exakta Varex IIa top
Exakta Varex IIa back
Exakta Varex IIa back
Exakta Varex IIa bottom
Exakta Varex IIa bottom
Exakta Varex IIa back open
Exakta Varex IIa back opened
Exakta Varex IIa Lego

Personal experience

As you have already figured out I like this camera the most because of its appearance. I think it really does look gorgeous even though I prefer more the versions with the engraved or embossed logo on the front plate. Despite this not too serious concern, I feel like holding something really special when I choose this for a walk. For me it is an outstanding experience to carry such a nice piece of history and heritage while I can be almost certain that the camera hanging on my neck is so unique I will probably not meet with anything even close to it. It has its charm and style to not to deny apart from what kind of photos came out at the end. Of course, the shoots are great too, nothing to complain about. What I want to say is that it is so elegant I might walk with it even if it was a bad camera (which is not!).

Exakta on my shoulder
Varex IIa in action

Ergonomics

Well, we have reached the point where I must stop extol this camera because the ergonomics is at least awkward.

The left-handed shutter release is really hard to get used to it. The shape of the body is nothing but convenient. It is in fact quite bulky. The reason is probably practical though,  this shape helps to keep the film more in place and flat according to some opinion and I eventually accept it.

Rewinding the film

To change the shutter speed, you have to pull out the dial and it is the normal procedure in this era, but not really convenient.  To set longer exposures (1/5-12s) you have to operate two dials by setting the main dial to T mode and setting the second for the speed. The film advance lever has an extremely long stroke and the mirror does not return after release.  The film transferred from one spool to another in the opposite way as it is usual as the system is left-handed, and to rewind the film you have to pull and turn a couple of things at the same time. Overall many things are a little bit complicated.

All in all this camera is the hardest to use among those I have ever tried. It is at least challenging and not as straightforward as switching your bicycle. But I think it is worth to fight and it is possible to realize that focusing on your left hand is only a habit, not a testament. After you have learned all the tricks it could be as easy to use as any other camera, but for me, it takes some time.

Proper ways to hold the camera while using the waist level finder. The  image is from the original handbook of the camera

This is how to hold the camera while using the pentaprism.

Focusing

Split screen focusing (Die Fotografie magazin 1952)

I have only a pentaprism with split screen focusing glass. It is dark for modern standards, although it could be also because my lenses are not exactly that fast (f/2.8) and the mirror is damaged around the edges. I suppose with a faster lens like a f/1.5 Zeiss Biotar and with a new mirror, it would be bright enough.

The split screen works as intended, but it takes a too big part of the screen (in my opinion) and I often use the matte parts around the central circle to focus instead.

I would love to try the waist level finder also because I prefer that on my Pentacon Six over the prism because of the extra lightness and the presence of a magnifying glass for pin accurate focusing. I don’t shoot much action with these anyway, I have time to focus precisely.

Ground glass vs pentaprism (Dr. Sevcsik Jenő, Fényképezés 1960 book)

Funny feature

There is a feature of this camera which had been hardly used by most and made me think quite a bit until I have found out what it is for. Interestingly enough you can actually cut the film inside the camera with a razor sharp hook-shaped blade. This way you can change film in the middle of the roll without the need for rewinding and calculating the position of the last exposed frame.

The blade is marked with the number 38. The image is from the original handbook of the camera.
Operation of the film cutting rod.

This blade can be seen on above on my photo where the back is open and for reference point please look the point 38 on the draft above. The operation is simple you have to screw out a lock at the bottom of the camera than you have to pull the rod and the blade cuts the film. I have never seen this before and while I am sure I will never use it, still it is a neat little feature. The engineers of Ihagee thought of everything.

Lenses and test shoots

Ihagee didn’t manufacture lenses by itself, but many brands made glass for the Exakta mount.

A very cool page to visit according to these lenses, in general, can be found here, and in detail with illustrations here.

I have got the camera with two lenses: a standard 50mm Tessar and a 100mm Trioplan. The Tessar had to get cleaned and lubricated, but the other lens is in a really nice shape.

Carl Zeiss Jena 50mm f/2.8

There is no Tessar written on the lens nor Carl Zeiss only Jena and a big “T” letter. The reason is that the East German Carl Zeiss Jena was not allowed to use it’s brand name nor the name of the lenses outside of the eastern block because the West German company owned the brand names. Nevertheless, this is a Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar lens and it performs as it should.

The Tessar is a classical construction or base type which consists of 4 elements 2 of them cemented together. These are considered very sharp and having a “hard” character (whatever it means). Because of the good performance, good enough speed and cheap production costs this lens type was very popular and have several siblings such as Elmar, Industar, Primotar, Skopar, Xenar, Ymmar, Ysaron, Belar etc. Apart from the direct relatives, there are many more modifications led to new lens families.

I am going to write a deeper article about this lens as soon as I can get an EOS to Exakta adapter.

Szentendre (Hungary), Exakta Varex IIa @ 1/1000s, Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 50mm f/2.8, Kodak Gold 200, Canoscan 9900F, high shutter speed fails
Bus station, Gyöngyös (Hungary), Exakta Varex IIa, Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 50mm f/2.8, Kodak Gold 200, Canoscan 9900F
Budapest(Hungary), Exakta Varex IIa, Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 50mm f/2.8, Kodak Gold 200, Canoscan 9900F
Underwater chair, Girona (Catalonia), Exakta Varex IIa, Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 50mm f/2.8, Kodak Gold, Canoscan 9900F

Meyer Optic Trioplan 100mm f/2.8

This is a triplet structure anastigmat containing obviously 3 elements. Although the structure is very simple it allows a relatively fast aperture and also it has the advantage of having no risk to get glued elements separated as there are none of them.

Some of the brothers are Anticomar, Cassar, Novar, Meritar, Radionar, Trinar, Triotar, Voigtar, Eurygon.

The triplet construction does not produce sharp images on large apertures due to the issues with the rays coming from sideways. This problem can be fixed on a level by stopping down. As you can see on the test photos the lens is indeed very soft wide open and it adds some kind of glow to the objects. It could even be beneficial for portraits by delivering a dream-like effect which hides most of the skin imperfectness of the model.

This lens is famous for its bokeh, which contains unusual and for most pleasing circles when shooting wide open. Unfortunately, I have no example taken by me so far, but you can see one here.

Again, I will do a deeper review of this lens as soon as I get an adapter to Canon and have some time to do more research.

Luca, Szentendre (Hungary), Exakta Varex IIa, Meyer Trioplan 100mm f/2.8 wide open, Fuji Superia, Canoscan 9900F
Vetus, Girona (Catalonia), Exakta Varex IIa, Meyer Trioplan 100mm f/2.8 wide open, Kodak Gold, Canoscan 9900F
Clarita and Jose Antonio, Girona (Catalonia), Exakta Varex IIa, Meyer Trioplan 100mm f/2.8 wide open, Kodak Gold, Canoscan 9900F
Girona (Catalonia), Exakta Varex IIa, Meyer Trioplan 100mm f/2.8 wide open, Kodak Gold, Canoscan 9900F
Vetus and SavE, Girona (Catalonia), Exakta Varex IIa, Meyer Trioplan 100mm f/2.8, Kodak Gold, Canoscan 9900F

Links

Carl Zeiss Jena Pancolar 80mm f/1.8

Carl Zeiss Jena Pancolar 80mm f/1.8

Introduction

The Pancolar 80mm f/1.8 is a late development of Carl Zeiss Jena which was at that time the East German part of the original company torn into pieces by the WW II. Therefore this lens was accessible in the eastern block mainly and even though now it can be found all around Europe, this is a very rare lens in other continents.

The lens has a high reputation as a sharp, fast portrait lens and it is quite expensive among other lenses of the same era. It has an M42 mount and was produced in both automatic and electronic forms. It was later remounted as the B-mount Carl Zeiss Jena Prakticar 1.8/80. (source Praktica-users.com)

Datasheet and optical formula

Pancolar lens schema
  • Construction:6 elements, 5 groups
  • Angular field: 30.4°
  • Minimum focusing distance: 0.8m
  • Diaphragm action: fully automatic
  • Coating: Multi-coated
  • Minimum aperture: f/22
  • Maximum aperture: f/1.8
  • No. aperture blades: 6
  • Filter size: 58mm screw-in type
  • Push-on diameter: 60mm
  • Weight: 310g
  • Barrel length: 64mm

This lens is a typical example of the legendary classic double Gauss lens formula also known as Planar.

The Double Gauss was likely the most intensively studied lens formula of the twentieth century, producing dozens of major variants, scores of minor variants, hundreds of marketed lenses and tens of millions of unit sales. It had almost no flaws, except for a bit of oblique spherical aberration, which could lower peripheral contrast. Double Gauss/Planar tweaks were the standard wide aperture, normal and near normal prime lens for sixty years.

The double Gauss lens consists of two back-to-back Gauss lenses (a design with a positive meniscus lens on the object side and a negative meniscus lens on the image side) making two positive meniscus lenses on the outside with two negative meniscus lenses inside them. The symmetry of the system and the splitting of the optical power into many elements reduces the optical aberrations within the system. (source: Wikipedia)

My Pancolar

I have got mine from the girlfriend of my father with the original case. She never used it, it was basically on the shelf without a camera since ages.

Probably she didn’t know what was the value of this lens, so I didn’t know neither. As it turned out it is an expensive lens among the usually very cheap M42 mount lenses. The market price is very similar to a new Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM, which is why I am often thinking about selling it. So far, I decided to keep it, because of the nice performance, character and because I can use it on many crazy cameras of mine.

The front cap was missing and the aperture blades were stuck, otherwise, as you can see in the photos below, the lens was in a really good shape. The glass was clean, no dust, no scratches, no fungus and it was obviously not used too much. I have substituted the missing front cap with a Canon cap of the standard 18-55mm kit lens. I tried to use other Ø 58mm caps, but this was the only one which was not tending to touch the front lens element.

The way it looks

Carl Zeiss Jena Pancolar 80mm f/1.8 box
Carl Zeiss Jena Pancolar 80mm f/1.8  hard-case
Carl Zeiss Jena Pancolar 80mm f/1.8
Carl Zeiss Jena Pancolar 80mm f/1.8
Carl Zeiss Jena Pancolar 80mm f/1.8
Carl Zeiss Jena Pancolar 80mm f/1.8
Carl Zeiss Pancolar Jena 80mm f/1.8

 

Personal experience

This is one of my favorite lenses. The images are always very sharp and have a good contrast with it. I can say that there are very little signs of any aberrations or distortions over the frame. I have not tested the lens scientifically yet so I cannot compare the performance in numbers with other lenses.  But real word experience is quite pleasant for me.

100% crop of a challenging image (high contrasts) at f/2.8, very little chromatic aberration can be seen

(post about this image),(full image)

At wide open, sharpness and contrast are a bit lower than stopped down by one-two stops, but still quite nice and I think this is very common with almost all fast prime lenses. Besides a slightly softer result can be beneficial for some portraits where little details of the skin can be smother and this way the model could look more perfect. The 80mm Pancolar is really not much softer wide open though. Colors are also rich and lovely and somehow different from my other lenses when using on the same digital body.

Dept of field & Bokeh

Only the right eye is sharp of this cat

I like this short telephoto lens because this focal distance allows me to take nice shoulder portraits while I am still close enough to the model to interact with.

Also, this lens has the ability to blur the background (like hell) very much because of the large maximum aperture. In fact, the depth of field can be so shallow that sometimes you get only a few centimeters of it and it has a risk that you miss the focus. A good example when only one eye of the model is in focus.

Speaking about bokeh (quality of out of focus elements), this lens produces a lot and the quality is superb, creamy. I know it is subjective to judge this property, so please have a look at the sample shots and decide yourself. The only caveat with it is the fact that the lens has only 6 aperture-blades. It could produce a not circular (multigonal) spots of highlights in the blurred background. It is a subjective thing again to like it or not, personally I prefer the perfect circles. This is not a problem when shooting wide open as the aperture is round at that case.

Build quality

Pancolar lens barrel extension

The Pancolar is a very well made lens which has a full metal + real glass construction.  It looks absolutely beautiful, feels solid and has a good weight to it. The aperture ring clicks at every half stops and operates very smoothly and precisely. The focus could be the same if I had got the right grease into it. -I will get it fixed soon. – The lens barbell extends a few milometers while focusing, but not seriously and the front element does not rotate -> there is no problem with polarizing filters to use.

There is a switch on the lens to set automatic or manual mode. When set to automatic the aperture stops down only when you press the shutter button and then it returns to full size when mounted on a compatible camera. In the case of manual mode, you must pre-set the aperture manually. This could be a nice feature too for videographers.

Conclusion

I have found a short summary on a nice website (Prime35.com) which is a perfect quote to close this post.

CZJ Pancolar MC 80/1.8

I’d say this is the best choice for versatile and sharp M42 80mm lens. It’s contrasty, it has the best wide-opened performance of all f/1.5-f/2 M42 portrait lenses. Center is close to Biotar, but borders are much sharper. Great colours (MC) + great bokeh. It also isn’t as risky as the early post-war lenses, because its coating is much harder, so cleaning marks are not an issue. For me it’s the best post-war Jena lens. (source: Prime35.com)

Links

Sample Shots

Using a digital body (crop frame)

On my cropped frame Canon body this lens is equivalent to a 128mm lens on a 35mm body due to the 1.6x cropping factor.

Albert (Girona, Catalonia), Canon 450D, Carl Zeiss Jena Pancolar 80mm f/1.8
SavE (Girona, Catalonia), Canon 450D, Carl Zeiss Jena Pancolar 80mm f/1.8
Gatto (Beget, Catalonia), Canon 450D, Carl Zeiss Jena Pancolar 80mm f/1.8


Using a digital body (full frame)

Old Ladies, (Gyöngyössolymos 2014),Canon EOES 5D ,Ca
Old Ladies, (Gyöngyössolymos 2014),Canon EOES 5D ,Carl Zeiss Jena Pancolar 80mm f/1.8
Márk, (Gyöngyössolymos 2014),Canon EOS 5D ,Carl Zeiss Jena Pancolar 80mm f/1.8

Using film

Puppet (Girona, Catalonia), Cosina CSM, Carl Zeiss Jena Pancolar 80mm f/1.8, Fuji superia 200, Canoscan 9900F
Antonio (Girona, Catalonia), Cosina CSM, Carl Zeiss Jena Pancolar 80mm f/1.8, Fuji superia 200, Canoscan 9900F
L (Miskolc, Hungary), Cosina CSM, Carl Zeiss Jena Pancolar 80mm f/1.8, Fuji superia 200, Canoscan 9900F
Weimar Lux CDS, Yashica TL Super, Carl Zeiss Jena Pancolar 80mm f/1.8, Fuji superia 200, Canoscan 9900F

For more samples see my Pancolar Flickr set.